Tag Archives: emerging markets

Tackling the corruption question at WEF on Europe

By Clare Melford, CEO of IBLF

 

 

This morning in Vienna, I facilitated a panel discussion at the ‘World Economic Forum (WEF) on Europe & Central Asia 2011‘  on new ways of tackling corruption around the world.

Held under Chatham House rules, the conversation was frank and honest. With representatives of government, civil society and business in the room, the role of each sector was examined.

The general view was that a matrix approach is needed to tackle this most thorny of issues. It is imperative to have rules and to enforce them whether you are in government or in business.

But rules alone will never be enough. A vital component is to change the culture to create one where corruption is just not cool.

In this aspect, civil society can play a huge role in changing public attitudes towards and acceptance of corruption. Also, prevention is better than cure. Technology can transform the situation by: a) making transparent processes that previously where opaque and b) by removing human intervention in the chain. Paying Afghan police direct to their mobile phones left them with 30% more money in their pockets than they were used to.

The audience in this session felt that the cross-sector and international approach that is now being taken against corruption (as evidenced by the enforcement of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and the potential introduction of an extra territorial bribery act in the UK), as well as the pressing need to remove this gross inefficiency from a world system already overstretched, gave us the best opportunity we’ve had for a generation.

IBLF is working hard to translate the optimism in the room into action on the ground. Take a look at some of our global work around anti-corruption here and watch this space.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Business standards, corruption, Emerging Markets

Can companies thrive in corrupt countries?

A guest post from Adrian Gaskell, Editor of The Management Blog for the Chartered Management Institute (CMI), a content collaborator with IBLF.

In our globalised world, companies increasingly find themselves operating in countries with less than squeaky-clean ethical norms.

With most businesses going to great lengths to portray themselves as sustainable and generally good corporate citizens, does trading in these areas rub off on the ethics of those exposed to it?  Does it even provide them with a competitive advantage in other more ethical regions?  These are the questions asked by Roberto Martin N. Galang of the John Gokongwei School of Management at Ateneo de Manila University, in new research published recently in the Journal of Management studies.

Galang reviewed 600 research articles from over 20 management journals to find examples of companies that deal with corrupt governments of varying levels, in countries including Russia, India, China and other emerging nations.

When in Rome?

Galang’s research revealed that certain companies seem able to thrive, even in corrupt regions, and some manage to prosper without resorting to un-ethical behaviours themselves. He found that an essential element of this success is forging a positive relationship with the local government that takes into account the unique environment of the region.

The research outlines 4 distinct approaches to take when operating in a corrupt market:

  1. Change from the inside – When firms have the ability to gain political influence in a country, they can use this influence to change the regulatory structure from within the political machine.
  2. Take the lead role – If a country has limited regulation to begin with, then successful companies often create their own self-regulating industry associations, shifting the responsibility for regulation to the industry rather than the state.
  3. Keep your friends close – If you’re operating in a country with a strong and centralised government such as China or Russia, successful companies strike up a good relationship with the local government, networking with powerful officials and partnering with important local firms.
  4. If you can’t beat them – The final strategy is to accede to the local regime, and is used by companies that don’t possess any real political clout in the area they wish to trade in, or where regulation doesn’t really impact on their industry. It is a common strategy in war-torn nations.

Galang stresses that corruption continues to have a major “corrosive” impact on the long-term health of the global economy, making it harder for many developing countries to attract foreign investment and adding uncertainty and risk to the effort of companies that do enter those markets. That said, corruption can be confronted, and its impact largely contained, if the correct local strategy is adopted.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Business standards, Conflict, corruption, Leadership

Corruption – still a ‘way of life’ in emerging markets?

By Brook Horowitz

The first decade of the 21st century was distinguished by tectonic shifts whose significance is only beginning to be appreciated now. It saw an inter-related rise of the emerging markets and the collapse of the global financial system due to a failure of governance both by regulators and corporations.

In this new multi-polar world, the main fault line is between the emerging markets and the developed world. When push has come to shove, multilateralism has been relegated to the back seat. The momentum found at the first G20 meeting in London in 2009 has not been maintained, dissonance is ongoing between China and the US about currency valuation, and the chaotic Copenhagen Climate Change conference of December 2009 is nothing more than a bad dream.

Nowhere are the differences in understanding of norms, and the opportunities for finding common ground, better illustrated than in the issue of corruption.

China, India, Russia – and many other countries that will become the engines of growth in this decade -  find themselves in the bottom half of Transparency International’s Corruption Perception Index. While most countries have signed up to universal principles of conduct such as WTO, OECD, and various UN instruments and introduced new laws domestically, it is clear that many of their leaders are ‘playing the game’, preferring to retain the status quo – for personal or other interests. Their usual excuses? ‘It is a way of life’, ‘it cannot be changed’, ‘the developed world is hardly a role-model’.

In the meantime, Western countries (led by the US), frustrated by the lack of progress in preventing bribery within their own economies and concerned about the risk of ‘infection’ from the emerging economies, have introduced extra-territorial legislation that could impact business not only at home but all over the world. Clearly there is a massive gulf between the two sides formed by differences in values, culture, and vested interests.

Bridging that gulf is the task of years and generations, but it needs to start now and business leaders can play a critical role in making that happen.

In fact, this process of change has already begun within many of these countries, and can be seen in IBLF’s work on promoting business standards in Russia, China, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia and India. Other programmes include working with companies and governments on creating business standards for specific industries, mentoring for the new generation of leaders or introducing business ethics materials to business schools. And all these programmes are developed with the support of the increasingly powerful and influential network of individuals – business people, civil society leaders, government officials – who have already understood the importance of combating corruption and are ready to help make change happen.

3 Comments

Filed under Business standards, corruption, Emerging Markets